Why We Need the Sacred Feminine

This post has been rolling around in the hay and compost for awhile — decomposing, fermenting and recomposing into something that resembles dirt. Or soil. Nourishment for roots, fungi, worms and souls. If that sounds distasteful to you, then you might not like this post, and I’m OK with that. But I cannot, in good conscience, say nothing, so here goes, in no particular order, because sometimes messy, sullied, unruly, damp and slimy provide exactly what standardized artificial fertilizers, synthetic UV lights, rationality and endless iterations of patriarchal straightjackets fail to deliver. Here goes.

Take a mainstream media source, any mainstream media source, male or female. Now take an alternative media source — go ahead, there’s a lot to choose from: Alex Jones, Jon Rappoport, David Icke, Zero Hedge, David Wilcox, Benjamin Fulford, Jeff Rense … and many more. Take a politician, any politician, male or female, including Hillary “Takes Glee in Having Defended a Man She Knew Raped a 12-Year-Old Girl” Clinton. Take a music video, fashion runway, magazine, or Hollywood film. Now pick a fundamentalist offshoot of a religion (any one will do) — Christian, Muslim, Jewish, Jesuit, even the “Golden” “New Age” fundamentalists.

Regardless of intention or sincerity, what do such a diverse group of “representatives,” “mouthpieces” and “arbiters” all have in common?

A complete desecration or denial of the Sacred Feminine. If She’s not attacked, co-opted as a female figurehead, or corseted into the more socially accepted “Divine Feminine,” then she’s simply absent. Not available for comment. Three Monkeyed out of existence. I almost wrote “Sacred Famine-ine” … because it’s that dry and barren. Nary a Goddess in sight, except to mock, co-opt, demonize, sterilize, neutralize, or ridicule. I am sure at least some of these people sincerely wish good will upon humans and our planet, but with friends like these, who needs Thought Police? Who needs a carefully orchestrated One World Government and One World Religion when we’ve already eradicated the Creatrix Womb and such subversive, exuberant, and juicy birth canals? Who needs the Hidden Hand of a New World Order, Ordo Ab Chao, when we’ve already neutered or repressed all that “superstition,” “mindless ritual,” “emotion,” “false energy Matrix” and “ridiculous”/”evil” magick?

Haven’t you heard? The Light of “Reason” or the Pure Light of the Golden Age of “Oneness” is on the verge of defeating and destroying all things dark, silly, irrational, unequal, evil and soulful. Haven’t you heard? The soul’s a “trap.” “They” will kindly remove and dispose of it to save you the trouble of reincarnating. Or emoting. You, too, can join the (non-hierarchical) ranks of never-ending Light. At first you’ll experience accelerated growth, but yeah, eventually, you’ll fry. That’s OK, though, because this is the “New” paradigm, the pinnacle of existence, the static “5D” nirvana of “Oneness.”

Yes, yes, yes, yes, yes, but….

What if Light is a force that enables clearer seeing, but like any force or tool, it depends on how it’s used? Light can illuminate or blind, just as fire can warm or destroy. Darkness, too, has its place. In the real world, important things take place in darkness. Like gestation. You know, in the womb. Or seeds, sprouting in the Earth. Or last year’s waste, turning into this year’s fertile compost. Light can sterilize and prevent infection, but “to sterilize” also means “to deprive (a person or an animal) of the ability to produce offspring, as by removing the reproductive organs” or “to make incapable of bearing fruit or germinating.”

A world of All Light, All the Time is no healthier and more fertile than a world consumed by Darkness. On the contrary. Light and Shadow play upon and through each other, showing depth and form. A world that demands and celebrates All Light, All the Time quickly becomes one dimensional. In the art world, chiaroscuro allows a two dimensional painting to reveal 3D form. This process happens due to the dynamic interplay of light and shadow. When you erase all shadows, you don’t “go 5D.” You go 1D. One dimensional. A single point. “Oneness,” yes, but with complete, permanent rejection of anything except light, you get annihilation, not increased dimensional options and creativity. That kind of radiation will eventually kill or sterilize everything.

“But I don’t want comfort. I want God, I want poetry, I want real danger, I want freedom, I want goodness. I want sin.”
― Aldous Huxley, Brave New World

“Oneness,” the “Cosmic Zero,” the “Stillpoint,” “One Love” — whatever you want to call it — is powerful because it contains All That Is in pure potential, but it’s also sterile without the impulse and ability to re-expand. That impulse to birth is inherently Feminine. And Sacred. The Great Mystery surrounds and imbues Creation. Indeed, we are “fearfully and wonderfully made,” something beyond pure mechanics. So is Life. (Or at least, certain types of Life.) Our Universe contains far more “dark matter” than scientists can explain. Our souls contain far more freedom than religion can detain. In Ancient Times, women isolated themselves during menstruation, not because it was dirty, but because the menstrual blood held so much power. Men needed protection from that potent, mysterious force of Nature.

I had originally planned to title this post “Desecration, Dimensions and Discernment: When ‘More’ Means ‘Fewer’ and ‘Less,'” but Gillian of Shift Frequency loved my almost typo: “Sacred Famine-ine.” I’ve settled upon “Why We Need the Sacred Feminine,” because most people seem to have forgotten that we do.

“A heap of broken images, where the sun beats,
And the dead tree gives no shelter, the cricket no relief,
And the dry stone no sound of water. Only
There is shadow under this red rock,
(Come in under the shadow of this red rock),
And I will show you something different from either
Your shadow at morning striding behind you
Or your shadow at evening rising to meet you;
I will show you fear in a handful of dust.”
― T.S. Eliot, The Waste Land

I’d like to make clear at this point that I have nothing against the Divine Feminine or Divine Masculine. We can certainly use more of those in our world; however, they are not, on their own, enough to create something entirely New.

We need the Sacred Masculine, too, but Sacred Masculine and Sacred Feminine are different in kind and function, as well as form. The Sacred Masculine can fertilize but He does not gestate. The patriarchy can desecrate seeds into GMO’s, inject nanobots and pervert DNA, but despite its obsessive efforts, it can never entirely control Creation. The ability to create and birth new life rightfully belongs to the realm of Mystery with a capital M. Conception, gestation and birth remain a process of the Sacred Feminine. The Sacred Masculine provides the spark of fertilization, plus strength, support and protection for the Sacred Feminine. Some kind of fertilization is necessary, but it is possible for the Great Mother to carry the New to term without the strength, support or protection of a Sacred Masculine. These qualities are nice, perhaps even preferred, but they are not inherently required. The Sacred Masculine, Divine Masculine and even the radiantly Divine Feminine cannot birth New Worlds into being anymore than a man or the external shell of a woman can grow and birth a baby.

Once the rebirth happens, the New can include the ongoing Cosmic Dance between Divine Masculine and Divine Feminine, as well as the Secret, Mysterious Communion of Sacred Masculine and Sacred Feminine. But we really need the Sacred Feminine in order to birth that New: if we want something truly New, rather than a shiny rehash of the crumbling old or complete annihilation, then me must honor and invoke the Great Creatrix.

OK, OK, but where can we find Her?

She hides and reveals Herself in Nature, shadows, chalices, coves and wells. She receives and allows reception. She rests in the Land Herself and in Ancient Songs and Ways. The Fae honor and adore Her. The Soul recognizes Her. We love Her as we embrace the Sovereignty of Land and Soul.

Recommended resources:

Care of the Soul by Thomas Moore

The Shadow King by Sidra Stone

The Mists of Avalon by Marion Zimmer Bradley

Return of the Dark/Light Mother or New Age Armageddon? Towards a Feminist Vision of the Future by Monica Sjoo

The Goddess vs. The New Age: Singing the Sacred Land by Jacqui Woodward-Smith

Tarot Shadow Work: Using the Dark Symbols to Heal by Christine Jette

The Goddess Path

Bealtaine Cottage

Eternal Curves

The Venus Project (photoshopped versions of classical art masterpieces — scroll to the right)

Your own two hands — in the soil, hugging trees, preparing food, healing and creating in deeply longed for ways.

21 responses to this post.

  1. so glad you posted this that we discussed…wow! and you’d never know how amazingly synchronous to my powerful experience just before coming to see/read this. and it so goes with my post today. LOVE YOU and all your courageous beauty to speak out!

    Like

    Reply

    • Aw, thanks, Tania! I will need to check out your post, too. I’ve been so busy with sessions, writing, food prep and weeding today that I’ve not done the bloggity blog thing yet. Looking forward to settling in for a bit now. Love you, too!

      Liked by 1 person

      Reply

  2. Reblogged this on Tania Marie's Blog and commented:
    Laura lays it all out on the table and tells it how it is….I so honor her courageous beauty to speak out, get down and dirty, and dig into the rich and gritty shadows. You’ll find no cotton candy here folks.

    If you have switched off one button in replace of another, you likely just remember some remnant of truth, but no longer feel it. Here’s a post that may not ring in for everyone, but it certainly will get your attention and ruffle any feathers that might have desired some aroused attention to their innate freedom potential.

    Like

    Reply

  3. Reblogged this on Reiki Dawn and commented:
    Thank you Laura. This beautiful and courageous post is to be shared, must be shared. Let it speak for itself. TRUTH

    Like

    Reply

  4. With all that brainwashing who remembers what the sacred feminine IS? I discovered this vid on Zen Gardners website… I have to admit there is quite a bit of truth that speaks to that something deep within me that still aims at protecting the authentic Self-self from exposing it’s LIGHT https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6NcLNoxiPBk#t=103

    Like

    Reply

    • Thanks, cdancer, I watched the video. I experienced that as the more typically presented sense of “dark,” as in oppressive and almost suffocating. I agree, from there, the LIGHT wants to expand. It comes down to that dynamic interplay of both so that we move beyond the need to judge and polarize — kind of like the yin-yang symbol, but imagine that as becoming a sphere instead of a flat circle. Or something more. Especially with this topic, English becomes completely inadequate. I swear, those faeries will get me writing poetry again!

      Like

      Reply

  5. I suspect it is the “rabbit hole” of disinformation and none are free of those.

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  6. Posted by James G on October 29, 2014 at 11:51 am

    Perfect Laura! Yes the ancients knew the power of the menstrual cycle. This is why they celebrated when a young female had her first. It meant life! Where do you think Christians got the idea to drink blood? The ancients drank the menstral blood because they knew how powerful it was. They also got the idea of eating the body from the sacred feminine to but that’s a total differnt story. Baptism practiced by the ancients had nothing to do with washing away yor sins, they were mimicking the soul going into the water of the womb!

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  7. Posted by James G on October 29, 2014 at 12:49 pm

    Sorry didn’t mean mimicking I meant portraying. 🙂

    Like

    Reply

  8. Posted by CindyW. on October 29, 2014 at 7:09 pm

    Thank you for this. I still have a bumper sticker my husband liked: “Change how you see, not how you look,” but then he was an unusual male who liked earth-centered women. I think even women devalue other women who do not fit patriarchal images of what is a “babe” or who appear as crones or messy, wild females instead of “princesses of the light.” Interesting post!

    Like

    Reply

    • Thanks, Cindy! Actually, if you check out some of the recommended resources, they reveal just that. The Sidra Stone book is particularly valuable, as it discusses women’s Inner Patriarch, which usually remains totally in Shadow, running the show in ways that it would not likely be allowed to do if brought to the light of day. The Eternal Curves article also shares how men see women’s curves and how much more men appreciate and value the feminine than women do, who try to narrow those curves and become more like adolescent boys. The link with the Venus photos was the most revealing to me, though. I saw those quite a long time ago, but it really stuck with me just how our media nips and tucks the Sacred Feminine in all her luscious curves and all that symbolizes. I was sharing with Gillian today that some of the most Goddess filled and dedicated people I know are men! I do love whole humans. 🙂

      Like

      Reply

  9. Posted by mia on October 29, 2014 at 9:01 pm

    such a great article, Laura. just wanted to share a short preview of a talk with Christiane Northrup, “Women’s Bodies Women’s Health, I just watched and enjoyed:

    Liked by 1 person

    Reply

  10. ablolutely amazing, i really enjoyed this blog. would love to know more about nenstural .and why it is potent. will look it up.

    Like

    Reply

  11. Posted by Kieron on October 30, 2014 at 11:05 am

    Great essay. It’s safe to say all are harmed in ways both blatant and subtle by the current paradigm. BTW, I rather like Joanna Powell Colbert’s “Gaian Tarot” version of The Hermit, which she describes as “the lunar male.” 🙂

    Like

    Reply

  12. […] wonderful, thoughtful blog. This post goes right along with some of my recent posts on the Sacred Feminine, tuning in with Mother Earth, and it even describes the origins of the word, […]

    Like

    Reply

Leave a comment