Federal Register ~ Solicitation of Written Comments on the Draft National Adult Immunization Plan

Thanks to Joe for this disturbing news/action item. In case anyone thought we were being paranoid that all this measles and Ebola hoopla has really been about gaining public demand/consent for mandatory adult vaccinations, here comes the first step of that roll out. The Department of Health and Human Services is accepting comments until March 9, 2015. I cannot advise you what to say, but if we don’t say something, we’re offering tacit permission for this to go forward.

https://www.federalregister.gov/articles/2015/02/06/2015-02481/solicitation-of-written-comments-on-the-draft-national-adult-immunization-plan#addresses

You can read the 52-page NAIP draft here at http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_draft.pdf

From the table of contents and the emphasis on vaccine friendly propaganda aimed at individuals, and tribal and religious groups, it’s clear the NAIP is setting the stage for the “informed” (only by pharmaceutical companies and their government pals) public to demand every adult in their community be vaccinated. Lather, rinse, repeat. Do it enough, and you’ll have a squeaky clean, brainwashed society who has forgotten all educated opposition to the jab. Once complete, create a lovely little biological warfare action/distraction or even just extra media hysteria and then boom! We’ve entered dangerous territory for health and health freedom — especially since the BigPharma companies are now immune from any punishment for “adverse reactions” to vaccines, up to and including death. Based on the proposed strategy, we can also expect healthcare providers and even church pastors to begin pushing the full spectrum of adult vaccines, not just the yearly flu vaccine.

If we move towards a complete national healthcare program, will anyone enrolled in it (i.e. everyone) then be required to follow a doctor “recommendation”? Already we see movements in Congress to remove the right to any exemptions based on any reasons — religious, health or other concerns. Already we see far increased cases of medical kidnapping in which CPS takes children from their parents because the parents simply asked for a second opinion. We’re not approaching medical fascism; we’re already living in it. The question remains, how far will we let this continue before we say “Enough is enough!”?

For the record, I’m not opposed to strengthening the immune system. I think it’s a fabulous idea. Nowhere does this draft include tips outside of vaccines for doing that, and as long as we have relatively free internet, it doesn’t take much effort for a non-brainwashed person to find studies of how vaccines actually decrease natural immunity in many people. Some vaccines like the MMR continue to shed live viruses for weeks after the injection, thereby circulating the very diseases the vaccine aims to prevent.

In addition to all the myriad vaccines to which babies and young children are exposed, the NAIP Objective 4.1 suggests developing even more vaccines. The US Department of Defense owns a patent on the Ebola virus, and Monsanto invested in TEKMIRA, an Ebola treatment manufacturer. What could possibly go wrong with a bioweapon in which ethical, non-profit driven, agent of transparency and good will toward humanity Monsanto is funding the “cure” for a pandemic? I remind you of the strong rumors even in mainstream Sierra Leone newspapers that the initial Ebola outbreak was found only in those who had been “vaccinated against it.” At best, vaccines are an inexact science. At worst, they offer a fabulous opportunity for plausible deniability of intentional mass genocide.

Conspiracy theorists have long warned of nanotechnology or NANO chips that could be injected via vaccine. Sounds pretty sci-fi, but Objective 4.2 is: “Encourage new technologies to improve the distribution, storage, and delivery of adult vaccines.” We already know that the FDA gives a free pass to Monsanto, et. al. in the areas of GMO foods and that the FDA is hugely biased towards BigPharma profits. Objective 4.1.2 wants to encourage increased “technologies (i.e. genome sequencing, bio informatics, and systems biology tools)” for the creation of ever more and ever more “effective” vaccines.

They also want to increase and create new adjuvants, which currently include dead or live viruses that have nothing to do with the label of the vaccine. Adjuvants purposely irritate the immune system so that it “responds” to the vaccine. When I spoke at a Lyme Disease conference in January 2011, some of the top Lyme Literate M.D.’s acknowledged that many of their patients had contracted Lyme, Epstein Barre and/or HIV from vaccines. I personally have a friend who collects government disability because he contracted HIV from a vaccine. He had the blood work before and after to prove it. This happened years prior to the more recent legislation that protects pharmaceutical companies from adverse reactions. In addition to other viruses, neurotoxic aluminum is another common adjuvant.

In addition to increasing adjuvants, the NAIP calls for increasing storage capacity. Thimerisol — also known as mercury, a known immuno-suppressor and neurotoxin — is a common vaccine preservative. Will we see more of it? Or will we just not know, since vaccine manufacturers are now permitted to alter their approved formulas without acknowledging they’ve done so?

Informed people can currently obtain exemptions; however, the NAID plan wants to increase pressure from all quarters for demands that all adults become vaccinated as their civic duty. I’m sorry, but when one’s “civic duty” includes allowing the BigPharmafia and Monsanto to inject whatever they deem “necessary” directly into my bloodstream with the possible addition of nano- or other technology, we’re living in a fascist nightmare in which we no longer own our own bodies. Yes, I know corporations have already patented body parts and human genes, and yes, the State has asserted that it, not the parents, owns the children. But again, how far are we going to allow this to proceed?

No big government collusion with big industry would be complete without vastly increasing the size of government. Well, fear not, the NAIP has plans for that! Enter: Adult Interagency Task Force (AITF). Enter increased monitoring of “progress, challenges and opportunities — all of which provide transparency to policymakers and the public.” Would that be the same kind of “transparency” we’ve had from the Obama Administration? The same kind of “transparency” we’ve seen from GMO manufacturers so eager to label their creations? The same kind of “transparency” we’ve seen in the 2,500 page Affordable Care Act inclusions? Would “challenges” include the need to criminalize people who have researched vaccines and want to opt out? Would “opportunities” include false flags or media staged “outbreaks”? Just curious.

Looking at “Goal 3: Increase Community Demand for Vaccinations,” reveals its leader in this area — the CDC (which has been caught seriously misrepresenting disease statistics). Goal 4 lists an unnamed “Biotechnology Industry Organization.” Does “transparency” include knowing which companies have the most crossover within the CDC, Congress and the Supreme Court? Does it include full public transparency of which Biotechnology Industry Organizations have direct origins in Nazi Germany? Again, just curious. We already know about IG Farben and Bayer; will the proposed “transparency” and “education” include more in-depth history? I didn’t think so. Such connections, combined with the Department of Defense’s involvement might make people nervous about getting poked by war criminals and eugenicists. That would counteract Goal 3.

You can find the current Adult Immunization Schedules at http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/hcp/adult.html , but again, the NAIP wants to increase the number of “recommended” or required adult vaccines. If you’re comfortable with this development, then move along, nothing to see here. If, instead, you take issue with any or all of the things I’ve shared here, I encourage you to read the plan for yourself in its 52 page entirety: http://www.hhs.gov/nvpo/national_adult_immunization_plan_draft.pdf

Comments are open through 5:00 p.m. Eastern US time on March 9, 2015.

(2) Electronic responses are preferred and may be addressed to: Rebecca.Fish@hhs.gov.

(3) Written responses should be addressed to: National Vaccine Program Office, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 200 Independence Avenue SW., Room 733G, Washington, DC 20201. Attn: HHS Adult Immunization c/o Rebecca Fish.

Personally, I intend to provide both an electronic and a written response. Let’s have Rebecca Fish swimming in comments that take more effort to eliminate than simply hitting a delete key.

27 responses to this post.

  1. Posted by Anthony on February 25, 2015 at 4:39 pm

    Thanks for posting this, I will definitely make my voice heard.

    In case there are people out there who are open to persuasion that vaccines are bad, Jean Haines posted a link to this document the other day:

    https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2015/02/23/green-med-info200-evidence-based-reason-not-to-vaccinate/

    If people still want to get vaccinated after reading that, they are insane! Unfortunately, I am running up against a lot of people who already have their minds made up on this issue, and most of them want to change MY mind – even though they have not researched both sides of it, as I have.

    This issue is beyond serious. If it does come to pass that people will be forced to vaccinate, I see this as one of three main issues – along with economic collapse and gun rights – as being a catalyst for major demonstrations up to and including potential violence. Let us pray that it does not come to that, and that those perpetrating these scams on us are brought out into the light for everyone to see them exactly as they are.

    Liked by 1 person

  2. Thanks for the additional link, Anthony! Yes, I agree with you about forced vaccination as one of the key issues that would cause massive demonstrations and resistance. Unfortunately, as you’re seeing, brainwashing already works well. I shudder to imagine just how well it will work with a full on mandate.

    Like

  3. This just in via private email: Hi Laura, I just read your article regarding the adult vaccinations. I came across this article yesterday and thought I’d share it with you. I tend to be put off by heavy exclamations but perhaps it’s a valid warning. http://starshipearththebigpicture.com/2015/02/24/dont-sign-yet-govt-trickery-with-the-anti-vax-petition-for-mandatory-adult-vaccinations/
    Hope you are well.

    My response to the email: Actually, after reading the Rima Laibow petition, I don’t think it’s a good idea to sign it and get on a list as an all out vaccine refuser. Given the choice between being rounded up into a FEMA camp of refusers in which case you’d likely get injected or shot anyway, I would probably take the jab and then flush my system with heavy metal chelators, vitamin C and other detoxers and anti-viral, anti-bacterial, anti-fungal agents. It’s not ideal, but at home, I can use a zapper right after a vaccine, whereas in a camp, you’d lose all freedom. My two cents. I often have questions about Dr. Rima and her husband — not all is as it appears.

    Like

  4. I was going to send you the same article, glad you’re alerting your reader’s Laura, Jon Rappoport’s blog post today https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/02/25/adult-immunization-push-medical-dictatorship/

    Like

  5. Thanks! Reblogged his post, too, since it contains similar but also additional information.

    Like

  6. How Wall Street has literally “BOUGHT” you and your family’s health https://www.boughtmovie.net/free-viewing/thank-you.php?AFFID=NONE&optin=1

    Like

  7. Thanks, Doreen!

    Like

  8. Posted by Do you want the government (big pharma) to take control of your own body? | Exopermaculture on February 25, 2015 at 6:58 pm

    […] Federal Register: Solicitation of Written Comments on the Draft National Adult Immunization Plan […]

    Like

  9. Nov 06, 2014 blanket immunity for drug manufacturers ended in Canada.

    Bill C17 Vanessa’s Law: The Act applies to therapeutic products including prescription and over-the-counter drugs, vaccines, gene therapies, cells, tissues and organs, and medical devices.

    http://blogs.perficient.com/lifesciences/2014/11/14/canadas-new-vanessas-law-contains-new-adverse-event-reporting-requirements/

    Like

  10. Good to know it ended in Canada. Now … to end it in the US!

    Like

  11. Reblogged this on Reiki Dawn and commented:
    This is an incredibly important piece of BS that is attempting to be made law. We have until 3/9 to respond. See info below in how to do that. Do we want sovereignty over our own bodies or he forced fed vaccines that in many instances are unsafe and God knows what else. Thank you Laura for posting such informative commentary with this piece of news that seems to be buried by MSM.

    Like

  12. Thank you, Dawn!

    Like

  13. Posted by CindyW. on February 26, 2015 at 11:02 pm

    your writings and links have changed my mind – I was a believer before in having the vaccines but choice not to have them. My own husband (doctor) was against many of them, always recommended I not have flu or hep vaccines when I worked on hospital staffs. The most telling point for me is as you say, granting blanket immunity. If vaccines are harmless, why is there a need to grant immunity? And I did not know all the ingredients that were in them, nor how frequent adverse reactions are, nor that one is supposed to report adverse reactions (but must have the mfgr’s name and date of the batch, etc. plus enter it on the appropriate form). No one who recommends vaccines tells you these things. Husband also believed vaccinations caused many animal diseases, first person to tell me of Juliette de Bairacli-Levy, who dropped out of vet school in the UK because she was opposed to animal vaccination.
    I need no convincing of the dangers of GMO, nor of the unholy control by BigPharma over regulators. Nor did I need convincing abt the power of the finance sector to collude BigPharma (which I once read was the single most powerful lobby to push through the WTO in the 1990’s), or its power in healthcare. There are whole sections of banks devoted to healthcare. And the mass media has been the servant of the finance sector for the better part of 30 years, since deregulation of the media began. As you say, it isn’t that we are stupid about not passing on diseases – it’s that if the cure is worse than the disease, you might want to consider a different cure!

    Like

  14. Posted by Anthony on February 26, 2015 at 11:50 pm

    Here’s another link, to a *head’s up* article: door-to-door COERCED vaccinations are occurring RIGHT NOW, WHERE I LIVE:

    http://www.healthfreedoms.org/door-to-door-surprise-vaccinations-in-ca-district/

    This has just gotten very, very real. It looks like we will be forced to choose sides, and that time is NOW.

    Like

  15. Thanks for the additional insights and information, Cindy. Yes, the need to grant immunity is a huge red flag, along with legalizing the ability to pass off a vaccine as the same as an approved one, but add ingredients without revealing what those are. Yeah, that really builds trust! But we’re the paranoid ones, right? Because BigPharma has proven itself so trustworthy over the years, and of course, Monsanto is a paragon of honesty and compassion. 😉

    Like

  16. Hi Anthony, thanks for this extremely disturbing link. It goes to show that the NAIP is already in effect. I foresaw this years ago; it’s one reason I acquired a magick wand. I don’t know just how effective that will turn out to be as a mode of self defense, but we do what we can with what we have. In 2011, I had a series of recurring dreams of having martial law declared and our house busted into by the military, searching for unvaccinated people. In the dream, I ended up recognizing one of the National Guard people, who looked horrible and had lost all his family. Somehow I convinced him to tell his other soldiers he had already gotten us. It was an awful, recurring dream, but we ended up being OK. Oddly enough, David and I now live in Indiana and happen to be about 2 hours from where this person lives, who is now in the National Guard. I hope that’s where the dream/reality crossovers end, but if they must continue in that direction, then I hope the end of the dream unfolds, as well.

    Strange times we live in. Peace, protection and blessings to you and yours….

    Like

  17. Posted by Anthony on February 27, 2015 at 4:03 pm

    Wow, that’s a disturbing dream all right. If it really does come down to them going door to door to force vaccinations on people though, I do think that – on top of all the other things going on – will turn the tide on the PTB.

    I did a little more investigation on the link above though, and discovered that the story is actually from 2011. Here is the Natural News link:

    http://www.naturalnews.com/034980_vaccinations_family_ambush.html

    So, I may have jumped the gun a little…unless they are still doing this and are just not bringing news crews along for the ride these days.

    I have also had many disturbing reoccurring dreams, where I keep seeing cars piled up on freeways here in Sacramento. As if they were bulldozed into place to keep people from driving out of the city. All the bridges out of the area were barricaded. I just hope all of these dreams of ours are warning dreams, and not what will actually happen…let’s pray that is so!

    Like

  18. Yes, I believe warning dreams come in time to make shifts so that the warnings do not come to fruition. Here’s hoping we’re raising enough awareness and making enough shifts that they are NOT coming to fruition. In some ways, the fact that that story is from 2011 makes me feel better. I haven’t had those dreams since 2011, so I very much hope that I was picking up on something at the time and not foretelling the future. Time will tell. Be safe and wise!

    Like

  19. Thanks, Doreen!

    Like

  20. Reblogged this on Laura Bruno's Blog and commented:

    Reminder: today is the last day to submit comments to the Department of Health and Human Services. Let’s give them a chance to prove their right to use this name in something besides an ironic sense, shall we?

    Like

  21. My own letter… please feel free to edit and personalize for your own use:

    Dear Ms. Fish,
    I’m writing to urge you to oppose the National Adult Immunization Plan. I have read the entire document, and I have grave concerns that it’s written primarily to benefit pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, with very little concern for humans who value and take responsibility for their own health. There is nothing within the document to encourage people to enhance their immunity in any ways besides subjecting themselves to vastly increased dosages of vaccines that our adult population has done fine without receiving in recent decades. Additionally, this document, which seems primarily intended to increase vaccine friendly propaganda and societal pressure, does not address the myriad studies demonstrating the dangers of some vaccines. Instead of educating the population to make more informed decisions, the NAIP clearly aims only to “educate” the population to accept and demand more vaccines. This proposal reads more like a marketing scheme than a health and human service!

    If you are not familiar with just how many scientific studies exist showing negative reactions to vaccines (up to and including death), I would urge you to read the following document, which contains well documented material you won’t likely receive from pharmaceutical and biotechnology sales proposals: http://www.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/gpub_58635_anti_therapeutic_action_vaccination_all.pdf . A court in Italy recently held that MMR vaccine causes autism: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2012/05/23/mmr-causes-autism-italian-court-translation/. Even in the US, the existence of an HRSA clearly shows that significant numbers of people experience negative reactions to vaccines: http://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/statisticsreport.pdf . The HRSA has been unable to dismiss many of the cases, leading one to conclude that despite corporate pressure, facts do support that some people react to vaccines with death, cancer or permanent disability. Even if the numbers are relatively small, people should not be stigmatized or ridiculed for wanting to make truly informed decisions about something that could potentially destroy their life as they know it. Marijuana kills far fewer people than vaccines, and yet we have a war on medical marijuana but a proposal for the NAIP. Why is that?

    In addition to concerns about current vaccines, I have grave concerns about the NAIP’s stated desire to invent even more vaccines, especially using biotechnology and enhanced delivery and preservation methods. Would these be genetically modified organisms? If so, which ones? Have these vaccines been tested on willing, informed subjects over multiple generations? What happens when a pig’s or insect’s DNA gets injected into the human bloodstream? How do we know these DNA modifications will remain stable over time? Biotechnology corporations routinely suppress scientific studies regarding the potential long term dangers of combining multiple species’ DNA in completely unnatural ways. We have seen the money and tactics used to prevent labeling GMO’s. Why would a thinking adult feel comfortable having these same biotechnology companies creating something that will not just be eaten but actually injected into the bloodstream? In terms of delivery and preservation, will the new methods include nano particles and/or additionally neurotoxic levels of mercury and aluminum? Again, I object to the NAIP’s attempts to stigmatize individuals for wanting to conduct their own research before agreeing to be injected by often untrustworthy corporations.

    “… Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT [diphtheria, pertussis, tetanus vaccine] reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more.” —Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987.

    “Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded… figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America’s children every year.” —DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich. 1986.

    According to the Polio Eradication Initiative’s own statistics, in India, there are now at least 100-180 children per year who develop polio paralysis following a polio vaccine. Prior to the vaccination campaign, only 42 cases of wild polio were reported in 2010 India. Vaccine injuries from the polio vaccine doubled or even four-fold increased the cases of polio in India. (More information here: http://vactruth.com/2013/11/26/vaccine-associated-polio/ ) . Instead of recalling the vaccine, Bill Gates and the Polio Eradication Initiative have simply stepped up their marketing campaign, not unlike the NAIP’s stated methods.

    Until vaccine manufacturers stop pushing for unlimited indemnity from reactions to their vaccines, we should not be trying to “educate” individuals to waive their rights to an informed exemption. I urge you to collect the vaccine pamphlets handed out by the pharmaceutical companies themselves and to read the fine print, in which they admit side effects ranging from siezures to death. Please read their own words and recall that these companies who benefit from the NAIP are lobbying to label anyone who objects to such side effects as a social pariah or an idiot. Then, please, check your own conscience to see if you feel good pressuring people to avoid taking responsibility for their own bodies. If the Department of Health and Human Services really wants to help people, please consider an alternative educational campaign about the importance of vitamin D, hand washing, and avoiding sugars and GMO corn syrup. I know there’s no money in that for the pharmaceutical companies pushing the NAIP, but there’s integrity in it for you.

    Sincerely,

    Laura Bruno
    Goshen, IN

    Like

  22. […] you decide if you’d like to encourage Rebecca Fish to exercise her conscience during this last day of public comment on the NAIP. Rebecca.Fish@hhs.gov […]

    Like

  23. […] then you decide if you’d like to encourage Rebecca Fish to exercise her conscience during this last day of public comment on the NAIP. […]

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: